Hareline Tungsten Cones Fly Tying Materials – All Varieties
Ben Carmichael 
# **Kylebooker Hareline Tungsten Cones Fly Tying Materials – All Varieties: Are They Worth the Price?**
As an avid fly fisherman, I’m always on the lookout for high-quality tying materials that can improve my flies’ performance. Recently, I came across **Kylebooker Hareline Tungsten Cones**, a popular choice among fly tyers for adding weight and a realistic profile to streamers and nymphs. But with various options available, I wanted to evaluate their **cost-effectiveness** before making a purchase.
## **What Are Kylebooker Hareline Tungsten Cones?**
These tungsten cones are designed for **fly tying**, providing extra weight to help flies sink quickly while maintaining a sleek, fish-attracting shape. Unlike traditional brass or lead cones, tungsten is **denser**, meaning smaller cones can achieve the same sinking rate without adding bulk. Hareline offers these cones in multiple sizes (e.g., 3.5mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm) and finishes, including **black, gold, and natural tungsten**, catering to different fly patterns.
## **Performance and Durability**
One of the biggest advantages of tungsten cones is their **durability**. Unlike softer metals, tungsten resists deformation, ensuring the cone maintains its shape even after multiple fish strikes. Additionally, the **smooth, polished finish** reduces friction in the water, allowing for a more natural drift—critical for nymphing and streamer fishing.
In my tests, flies tied with these cones **sank noticeably faster** than those with brass alternatives, making them ideal for deep pools or fast currents. The variety of sizes also allows for precise weight adjustments depending on fishing conditions.
## **Price Comparison: Are They Worth It?**
Tungsten materials are generally **more expensive** than brass or lead, and Hareline’s cones are no exception. A pack of 25 tungsten cones (depending on size) typically costs **$8–$12**, whereas brass cones may be half that price.
However, considering **longevity and performance**, the investment is justified. Since tungsten is harder, the cones last longer, meaning fewer replacements over time. Additionally, the **enhanced sink rate** can lead to more strikes, potentially improving catch rates—something that cheaper alternatives may not deliver.
## **Alternatives and Final Verdict**
If budget is a major concern, brass cones from brands like **Flymen Fishing Company** or **Wapsi** are viable alternatives. However, for anglers who prioritize **fast-sinking flies and durability**, the **Kylebooker Hareline Tungsten Cones** are a **solid investment**.
### **Final Rating: 4.5/5**
✔ **Pros:** Durable, excellent sink rate, multiple size/finish options
✖ **Cons:** Higher initial cost than brass/lead
For serious fly tyers looking to maximize efficiency, these tungsten cones are a **cost-effective choice in the long run**. If you fish deep waters or fast currents, the performance boost is well worth the price.
Would I buy them again? **Absolutely.** Tight lines! 🎣